Search for: "Williams v. Office of Public Defender" Results 241 - 260 of 1,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am by Elie Mystal
This way they can’t defend and say they thought concern ended because you did not renew the fear. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
The public importance of this case cannot be overstated. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm by Orin Kerr
Johnson, 457 U.S. 537 (1982), but defendants whose cases become final cannot get the benefit of the exclusionary rule on collateral review, see Stone v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
"  The same 11th Circuit divide quickly emerged in Williams, litigation over an Alabama law prohibiting distribution or sale of sexual devices, the majority finding the state's public morality concerns sufficient to meet a rational basis test. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Punitive damages are available where the plaintiff demonstrates "conduct that was directed to the [*17] general public or that evinced the requisite 'high degree of moral turpitude' or 'wanton dishonesty.'" Williams v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Gerrish, No. 081045 In a claim that defendant-police officer violated plaintiff's constitutional rights by using his Taser during the course of arrest, verdict in favor of plaintiff and compensatory damage award of $111,000, are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) defendant was entitled to qualified immunity; and 2) the district court's answer to a jury was responsible for an inappropriate damages award. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:46 am by Susan Brenner
I will need to supplement my current [public school] income . . . by at least an equal amount. . . . [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:25 am
Greenberg, Office of the Public Defender, New York (Christina Graves of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:25 am
Greenberg, Office of the Public Defender, New York (Christina Graves of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:14 pm by Admin
(Please do not recommend the Ohio Public Defenders office,I already received the run around from them, and they will not do anything for me). [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am by INFORRM
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45)  he should have… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Susan Brenner
A public official is defined as `any elected or appointed officer, or employee, or agent of the state or any political subdivision. . . . [read post]