Search for: "Young v. State, Department of Human Services"
Results 241 - 260
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm
Dept. of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
The first was Freeman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230 REGULATIONS. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:30 am
AM v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2486 (Admin) (03 October 2011) October 3, 2011 Mr Justice Silber in High Court: Refusal to amend 5 aspects of control order was lawful. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
A joint motion to terminate is the ICE attorney’s way of letting you stay in the U.S. to try to fix your immigration status through the Department of Homeland Security and/or the Department of State [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:13 pm
(with Leonard Riskin, James Westbrook, Chris Guthrie, Richard Reuben and Jennifer Robbennolt). – AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
SebeliusCourt: U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-1058, 11-1057 September 8, 2011 Judge: Motz Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Health Law The Commonwealth of Virginia brought suit against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, challenging one provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The positions were "unclassified" and not protected under the Tennessee Civil Service Merit System. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
Read People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
This was a matter which had divided the House of Lords, and consequently been left open, in R v G (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2008] UKHL 37, in which a decision to prosecute a 15 year old for sexual intercourse with a 12 year old was challenged. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
It is an honor to be here with you at the annual Interfaith Prayer Service and to be with my colleagues on the Federal and State Courts for whom I have much admiration. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:36 am
Walters noticed several pictures in the home of [Creech]with a young girl. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
