Search for: "v. Atkins"
Results 241 - 260
of 900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
Kernan v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:19 pm
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:16 pm
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
He and his lawyers didn’t have a chance to present evidence of his intellectual disability until more than 20 years later, when the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:53 pm
On Jan. 12, Western District Judge Ricardo Martinez refused to dismiss such claims plaintiff brought in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:58 am
To determine strength, courts place the mark on the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness most prominently discussed in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:59 am
In the Ninth Circuit, it is known as the “Sleekcraft” factors, after the influential trademark infringement case of AMF Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
Although we do not quarrel with that proposition, we believe that judicially dissolving a foreign business entity is entirely distinct from resolving a dispute over its internal affairs (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d at 801 [distinguishing between derivative claims involving internal affairs of a foreign corporation, for which there is subject matter jurisdiction, and a dissolution claim, for which there is not]). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:49 am
[Ed. note: The Arizona FPD represented the codefendant in this case.]Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
UPDATE EVEN: Mike Atkins has more. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
In that sense, the rule from Miller was different from other categorical (and thus substantive) punishment bans, like capital punishment for intellectually disabled defendants, Atkins v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
In that sense, the rule from Miller was different from other categorical (and thus substantive) punishment bans, like capital punishment for intellectually disabled defendants, Atkins v. [read post]
