Search for: "v. SPEARS" Results 241 - 260 of 533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2011, 2:08 pm by Andrew Berger
That’s because on December 20, 2011, the Ninth Circuit held in UMG v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]; see Matter of Gerber v Goldberg Segalla LLP, 199 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017], quoting Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]; see Matter of Gerber v Goldberg Segalla LLP, 199 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:48 am
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 10, 2009 Spears v. [read post]
This cyber-scam is form of ‘spear phishing’ known as business email compromise (BEC) attacks, or CEO spoofing. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:09 am by Mary Costigan and Joseph J. Lazzarotti
This cyber-scam is form of ‘spear phishing’ known as business email compromise (BEC) attacks, or CEO spoofing. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the case of Mohamed v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am by Lyle Denniston
Spears — lawyers’ access to private driver’s license records for use in preparing lawsuits Mon., January 14: 11-9335 — Alleyne v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:00 pm by Kedar S. Bhatia
Spears), and Phillips has yet to argue a case during October Term 2012. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, the decision state that “Judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited and where the arbitration hearing is conducted pursuant to Education Law §3020-a, judicial review is limited to the grounds set forth in CPLR 7511. [read post]