Search for: "v. Steele et al" Results 241 - 260 of 283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
Weber Company neglects to defend its mark (Class 46)   Serbia Balkan anti-counterfeiting - Serbia and Macedonia customs authorities border closures (RelatIP)   South Africa Debate about abandonment of the Springbok, South Africa's traditional rugby emblem (Afro-IP) Spain Geographic indications v trade marks: Supreme Court confirms refusal of Spanish trade mark application for VINO DE LA TIERRA ARRIBES DEL DUERO (translation: wine from the land of Aribbes del… [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
., a Single Employer (29-CA-14548, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 12) Brooklyn, NY Sept. 25, 2008. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:40 am
  (31-CA-26120, et al. ; 352 NLRB No. 110) Ontario, CA July 24, 2008. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
.) *** Loyalhanna Health Care Associates t/d/b/a Loyalhanna Care Center, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership (6-CA-28609, et al.; 352 NLRB No. 105) Latrobe, PA June 30, 2008. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
In an earlier survey of 3,999 persons in California, 3.2% reported drinking raw milk (Headrick et al, 1997). [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:45 am
Barnstable School Committee, et al. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:45 am
(in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-1246 Case name: Hanna Steel Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Ohio County, Indiana, et al (NFP) In the Matter of R.W. and M.W. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Tom King, et al (NFP) - "Although it may have been preferable to consolidate both flooding instances into one lawsuit, each flooding occurrence creates a separate cause of action. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:56 am
Pyramid Enterprises, Inc., et al., 509 F.3d 184 (3rd Circ. 2007) [read post]