Search for: "v. doe et al"
Results 241 - 260
of 8,776
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
Quick links Stephanie Biden et al, Bates Wells: Faith-based Organisations 2023 Update: a helpful overview – especially the roundup of cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:40 pm
Perlmutter, et. al.). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 12:18 pm
” In Pitre v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Thus, petitioner has failed to prove that the distribution of these stickers affected the outcome of the budget vote (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeal of Crawford, et al., 47 id. 413, Decision No. 15,739; Appeal of Holliday, 42 id. 242, Decision No. 14,840). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Thus, petitioner has failed to prove that the distribution of these stickers affected the outcome of the budget vote (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeal of Crawford, et al., 47 id. 413, Decision No. 15,739; Appeal of Holliday, 42 id. 242, Decision No. 14,840). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
Doe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
” Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre Gmbh, et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 8:18 pm
This case, known as Yarbrough, et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
In JBrick, LLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
The order to dismiss the Qualcomm class action(s) came one day after Judge Corley also made a decision (in a class-action matter that does not involve Qualcomm but also followed an FTC action) relating in part to yours truly's communications with Microsoft: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
AN INTRODUCTION TO E. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Ruby Freeman et al v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:17 pm
Winborne, et al., C.A. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
Avanci et al., 5th Cir., 2022) to the East Coast (FTC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 8:27 am
Keech Law Firm, P.A., et al., 2023 Ark. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
Here's the decision, which I'll explain briefly: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23977262-23-09-13-order-on-motion-to-dismiss-le-figaro-et-al-v-apple: Société du Figaro et al. v. [read post]
