Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 2581 - 2600 of 5,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 5:48 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Alta Charo, University of Wisconisin Law School - Creating Life as Protected Expressive Conduct Leslie C. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:52 am by James Aspell
In settlements where the future medical is going to be closed as part of the settlement the following must be considered: CLASS I BENEFICIARY Claimant is considered a Class I Medicare beneficiary if: a) Claimant is 65 years or older; b) Claimant has been on SSDI for 24 months or longer; or c) Claimant has End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) As such, regardless of settlement value and including “compromise” settlements, you must consider Medicare’s interests. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 5:57 pm by Joy Waltemath
Generally, the cost of health insurance is affordable within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. 36B(c)(2)(C) if the portion an employee would have to pay for employee-only coverage would not exceed a specified percent of household income (9.56 percent in 2015). [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, given Father's professed inability to support himself as a podiatrist, Mother presents as more consistent in her ability to support A.L. financially. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under the law of equitable distribution, there is a presumption that all property acquired by either spouse during the marriage is marital property (see Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][1][c]). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:14 am by Bob Eisenbach
Unlike equitable subordination of claims under Section 510(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, which the bankruptcy court may impose if the specific circumstances merit it, Section 510(b) subordination is mandatory and applies to entire categories of claims. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:14 am by Bob Eisenbach
Unlike equitable subordination of claims under Section 510(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, which the bankruptcy court may impose if the specific circumstances merit it, Section 510(b) subordination is mandatory and applies to entire categories of claims. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:31 am by Leslie Sammis
 This legislation would require Transportation Network Companies like Uber to insure personal vehicles with commercial insurance even when a driver is not logged into the platform, is not supported by insurance leaders or the ride sharing industry. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:31 am by Leslie Sammis
This legislation would require Transportation Network Companies like Uber to insure personal vehicles with commercial insurance even when a driver is not logged into the platform, is not supported by insurance leaders or the ride sharing industry. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:35 am by Christopher Simon
Imperial Sugar Company owned the refinery, and Imperial’s property insurance underwriter contracted Zurich to perform annual inspections at the plant. [read post]
  For instance, the company is not required to contribute to unemployment insurance funds, provide expensive benefits (e.g., medical insurance), or allow participation in retirement, profit sharing, and similar plans. [read post]
  For instance, the company is not required to contribute to unemployment insurance funds, provide expensive benefits (e.g., medical insurance), or allow participation in retirement, profit sharing, and similar plans. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
We’ve already discussed the peculiar decision in Watts v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
We normally see these changes as they related to car insurance in Ontario, or changes to the accident benefit regime (reduction in benefits or increase in premiums for Ontario motorists). [read post]