Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 2581 - 2600 of 4,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2015, 7:15 am by Larry
You may recall that in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by SHG
Amnesty International has released a report on the state of law enforcement in the United States, and it’s unattractive. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
More trouble than training, really: A Pentagon spokesman stated that under 200 moderate Syrian rebels are currently being trained by the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm by Staley Smith, Quinta Jurecic
The United States has previously insisted that the troops in Iraq are stationed there for advisory roles only. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:54 am by Joe Consumer
Three years later, “a South Carolina jury award[ed] the largest judgment ever against a hate group in Macedonia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm by Steve Vladeck
Thus, as Justice Black put it with respect to courts-martial in United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
United States, rests on a narrow, grudging reading of Congress’s war powers. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Jim Gerl
See, Dear Colleague Letter 114 LRP 1091 (US DOE & DOJ 1/8/14)  The United States Departments of Education and Justice issued policy guidance for school districts and states to reduce unlawful discrimination in student discipline policies. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:49 am by NBlack
In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified the following question to the New York Court of Appeals: What are the minimum requirements a lawyer must satisfy in order to meet the statutory directive that nonresident attorneys must maintain an office within the state “for the transaction of law business” under Judiciary Law § 470? [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Even knowing falsehoods about large groups likely protected, too: Given United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
The committee said it was clear, to it, that “the 14th amendment to the Constitution has no effect whatever upon the status of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States,” but that “straggling Indians” were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]