Search for: "Bradley" Results 2581 - 2600 of 6,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2010, 6:37 am by Big Tent Democrat
I think Bradley will move Dempsey forward from the midfield and Bradley will put Ricardo Clark and Maurice Edu in midfield. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:25 am by Duncan Hollis
Most recently, Curt Bradley and Mitu Gulati have joined the conversation with their article, Withdrawing from International Custom. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:30 am
(45:30) Karen disagrees with Bradley's comments on OIN and thinks his characterization of the patent pool is a serious exaggeration. (46:00) These show notes are Copyright © 2010, Karen Sandler and Bradley M. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 12:02 pm by Big Tent Democrat
For the 3 forwards, it appears that Bradley will go with Altidore and Robbie Findlay. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:50 am
Show Notes Segment 0 (00:34) Fontana (and other Red Hat employees) pointed out some imprecision in what Bradley said in Episode 0x1D about Debian non-free [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:26 am by Gritsforbreakfast
OTOH, it's also possible the longer timeline will give Bradley's opponent a chance to make the associations among voters between Bradley and the Morton case that 60 Minutes left out. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:21 am
Show Notes Segment 0 (00:34) Bradley mentioned that people at LinuxCon North America 2012 were talking about this article, wherein it states 51% of survey respondents believe [bad] weather can impact cloud computing. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 10:47 pm
Bradley's appeal, I wondered whether the convenience to the state courts is the best method of marking the dividing line between the judicial and executive branches. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
My response offers the following arguments: (1) Currently, the most significant contested issue about customary international law in US discourse concerns the laws of war - a topic that Bradley and Gulati treat only briefly and incidentally. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:25 am by mv284
Bradley and Gulati find support for the Default View in an anology between customary and treaty law and in the model's purported functional advantages.Brilmayer and Tesfalidet challenge Bradley and Gulati's model for unilateral withdrawal by first highlighting the legal distortion underlying the analogy to treaties (there isn't a comparable unilateral right to opt out of treaties). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:03 am
(03:35) Karen mentioned the Free Culture definition. (08:22) Larry Lessig presented to an FSF Members Meeting using Mac. (09:22) Bradley and Karen argued about whether or not OpenOffice.org and/or Firefox run better on non-GNU/Linux systems than on GNU/Linux. (18:00) Bradley and Karen argued about whether or not otherwise proprietary company control of Free Software causes problems by default. (21:10) Segment 1 (27:00) Lara Moy got Ubuntu running on her Mac hardware.… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:20 am
(39:16) Bradley mentioned Chris Hertel's appearance on Linux Outlaws.(44:25) Karen mentioned The Scientific American article entitled Secret Computer Code Threatens Science. (54:00) Bradley mentioned Roland McGrath (56:44) Send feedback and comments on the cast to . [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
Show Notes Segment 1 (03:12) Bradley wrote a blog post about the Bionic issues that were raised. (03:44) On the old oggcast, Karen and Bradley discussed the Android/Linux system and Bionic specifically. (04:09) Karen mentioned an old oggcast where permissive vs. copyleft licensing was discussed. (06:19) Jake Edge wrote an LWN article that discussed Bionic (07:58) Bradley mentioned Raymond Nimmer's blog that started the… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:30 am by Chip Merlin
Because the district court treated ACV as synonymous with the pre-storm market value of the Bradleys' home, it incorrectly held that there was no evidence suggesting the Bradleys had uncompensated losses. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, defendant ignores the effect of Bradley’s changes to her plans, which could not have been reasonably anticipated when plaintiff commenced the Bradley Litigation in March 2015 because Bradley only exchanged the revised plans in May. [read post]