Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
A few months later the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Furman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
The State of California won and lost bigly last July 4th. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
When the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision Riley v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm
On August 3, 2011, Litepanels, Inc. of Van Nuys, California and Litepanels, Ltd. of the United Kingdom (collectively, “Litepanels”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:22 pm
United States (Jurisdiction; Grant in Aid Funds) on 4/5/18. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Polo v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette filed a brief with the United States Supreme Court yesterday laying out Michigan's official position on the constitutional question of whether states can ban same-sex marriage. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:21 am
He served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York from 1982-1986, and then later as the United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
I'm looking for a lawyer admitted in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and preferably working in the Bay Area, to act as pro bono local counsel for someone involved in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
I'm looking for a lawyer admitted in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and preferably working in the Bay Area, to act as pro bono local counsel for someone involved in this case. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 12:43 pm
Facts: This case (Racies v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 7:51 am
Qualcomm Incorporated – United States District Court – Northern District of California – December 17th, 2018) involves a complicated interaction between cellular communications standards, standard essential patents (“SEPs”), and the market for baseband processors, or “modem chips”. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:46 am
Qualcomm Incorporated – United States District Court – Northern District of California – December 10th, 2018) involves a complicated interaction between cellular communications standards, standard essential patents (“SEPs”), and the market for baseband processors, or “modem chips”. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
United States (1968) 391 U.S. 123, 128-136 (Bruton).) [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:20 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:34 pm
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:37 pm
The Ninth Circuit has granted rehearing en banc in an interesting venue case, United States v. [read post]
