Search for: "Carrier"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 32,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 6:29 pm
(A board clerk had made a key stroke error which placed the wrong carrier on notice for the first hearing. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:07 am
” It all sounds so harmless… until you see among other things Carrier IQ’s tools are capturing your text messages. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
Specifically, the carrier alleged that the policyholder had failed to: (1) submit documentation requested by the carrier; and (2) submit to an examination under oath. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:58 am
More carriers also means more work for authorities charged with ensuring safety compliance. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:45 am
Further, if the statute of limitations has run against the uninsured motorist, a direct action cannot be maintained against the uninsured motorist carrier. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 5:01 am
Over 30 percent experienced such injuries in carrier injuries. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:48 am
The motor carrier may be held liable for any damage or injuries that result from such an infraction. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:48 am
I don't know why I opened and perused a case involving competitive local exchange carriers (businesses that purchase telephone service from major carriers and resell it to end users) this morning, but maybe it was to find this:Plaintiff's Amended Verified Complaint consumes one hundred fifty-five (155) pages to allege twenty-seven (27) causes of action in three hundred eighty-nine (389) paragraphs. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
From the moment a shipper and a carrier agree in a written contract that the carrier is responsible for sanitary conditions during transportation, the carrier training requirement applies. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Regular readers of Tort Talk may recall that I previously reported on the Post-Koken issue of whether or not the underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier defendant could assert a cross-claim against the tortfeasor defendant seeking the recovery on the UIM carrier’s potential subrogation rights (i.e., if the UIM carrier pays out money to the injured party, the UIM carrier has a right to recover the amount of that payment from the tortfeasor who caused the… [read post]
26 May 2021, 10:28 am
Catch the podcast here: https://www.hoashow.org/episode-when-to-tender-claims-to-the-insurance-carrier/ [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Just got an email from one of our carriers updating us on the (formerly voluntary) "Data Sharing Agreement. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 4:27 pm
Your PIP (Personal Injury Protection) benefits are paid through your Massachusetts auto insurance carrier. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:35 am
In this matter, the plaintiff was suing the defendant carrier for insurance benefits and for bad faith. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:20 am
Carriers that fail to achieve that threshold (and therefore spend more than 15% of premium dollars on things other than paying health insurance claims and quality activities) must pay the rebate. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:29 am
Applying Arkansas law, the court overturned a summary judgment against a former bank director who sought recovery from the bank's D&O insurance carrier. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
Another little under-the-radar ObamaCare© nugget, this one funnels some $5 billion to insurance carriers, via early retirees participating in their erstwhile employers' group health insurance plans.As a side note, ObamaCare©'s certainly turning out to be quite the cash cow for those evil, greedy, heartless insurance carriers, isn't it? [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:20 am
Carriers that fail to achieve that threshold (and therefore spend more than 15% of premium dollars on things other than paying health insurance claims and quality activities) must pay the rebate. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 8:00 pm
If it’s a legitimate out-of-state sale – there’s no game-playing going on, the buyer genuinely has a home somewhere else – why should it matter whether the work ships by FedEx or by common carrier or by horse and buggy? [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
The court noted that Pennsylvania law does not exclude insurance evidence under these circumstances.As such, the court found that Allstate had not established a reason to use another name for the carrier at trial or that the carrier would be prejudiced by the use of its name at trial in front of the jury. [read post]
