Search for: "Carter v. Carter"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 2,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2008, 1:23 pm
The Supreme Court in Attorney-General of Saskatchewan v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Altria Group v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 7:14 pm
McCormick v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Fletcher Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville 08a0588n.06 Virga Carter v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 1:09 pm
In two earlier posts (here and here) about a transgender discrimination claim decided in Connecticut, I noted that the case of Schroer v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 12:22 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 6:25 am
Old-Maverick-Populist-Soldier versus Jimmy-Carter-With-Harvard-Law-Degree. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
We can only conclude herein that the prosecutor's "inflammatory [comments had] a decided tendency to prejudice the jury against the defendant" (Ashwal, 39 NY2d at 110; see People v Carter, 31 AD3d 1167, 1169; People v Almethoky, 9 AD3d 882).Another big win for Mary Davison. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:18 pm
Thanks to Carter White for this: The Ninth Circuit today, in CPLC v Napolitano, upheld as constitutional the Legal Arizona Workers Act, that imposes state sanctions on employers who hire people who do not have federal work authorization. bh [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 11:53 am
Row V! [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 4:45 am
Saratoga County, 234 A.D.2d 764, the Appellate Division said that "persons who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the charges," citing a number of decisions including Matter of Lowy v Carter, 210 AD2d 408, Matter of Hicks v Fortier, 117 AD2d 930; and Matter of Ortiz v Lesser, 83 AD2d 663. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 2:09 am
Jack Meligan December 2007 COMMENTS As Ronald Reagan Said to Jimmy Carter "There You Go Again! [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
Carter, 525 U.S. 83, 89 (1998) (acknowledging that "in some circumstances a person may have a legitimate expectation of privacy in the house of someone else"); Minnesota v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 8:47 am
In Bell v Kelly, the Court has agreed to examine some part of this quandary. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
.; et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Carter, 490 F.3d 641, 643 (8th Cir.2007). [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 11:52 am
Carter G. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 6:29 pm
Aug. 19, 2008) (available here) US v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 12:02 am
The 3/12/2008 Court of Appeals decision in Steve Carter v. [read post]
