Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 6,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2012, 9:04 am
The case Mendenhall v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:30 am
(New York State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
Just Film, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm
This question is going to be answered in EUIPO v Nowhere (case C-337/22 P) for opposition proceedings and in Shopify v EUIPO (case C-751/22 P) in invalidity proceedings. [read post]
“Electronically Transmitted Text” Isn’t “Visual Representation” or “Handwritten or Printed Material”
6 Feb 2010, 9:13 am
” The relevant definition of the word “write” is “to form or trace (a character or series of characters) on paper or other suitable material with a pen or pencil. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 7:58 am
In NERA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:15 am
V). [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
State of Indiana (NFP) M.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:05 pm
In this case (Estate of Presley v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:33 am
See Siegel v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
Jones v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm
CARL V. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
For example, Judge Schroeder said in Stephenson v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Omnicom Grp., Inc., 852 F.3d 195, 200 (2d Cir. 2017) (finding plausible discriminatory intent where a supervisor explicitly stated that an openly gay plaintiff “must have AIDS” because he was “effeminate and gay”; Sassaman v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am
| Keeping up with Dutch patent litigation: Half-year case law review 2020 | Beijing IP Court: let’s talk about short video copyrights | Rick Ross wins legal beef with 50 Cent: the Second Circuit holds that 50 Cent's Publicity Right claim is preempted by the Copyright Act | Copyright, Trademark, International IP, and Trespass: Imapizza LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:14 am
In Kindred v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
The case is Harris Faulkner v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:57 am
* United States v. [read post]
