Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 2581 - 2600 of 17,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The complaint goes on to charge each defendant with violations to various sections of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:19 am by Doug Cornelius
We seem to accept that power, but how far back can the SEC go to grab cash from defendants? [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:54 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
There likely is no evidence that the third-party defendants (hotel and security company) had any prior knowledge of the defendant’s intent or intentionally helped him to carry out his alleged crimes. [read post]
But our recent experience co-defending Goldman Sachs in a five-week jury trial demonstrates that corporate defendants need not avoid juries at all costs, especially where important principles are at stake and there is a strong belief that the claims are baseless. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:18 am by James Hamilton
The trader was also involved with others in using false information to attract investors to a company. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:57 am by Above the Law
But, yeah, cutbacks at the public defenders. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Wilkes-Barre Hospital Company, No. 16-CV-6463 (C.P. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 1:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The plaintiffs had secured an assignment of the right to sue for bad faith from the underlying defendant who had $50,000 in liability coverage but was hit with a jury verdict that amounted to a little over $1.9 million dollars. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The plaintiffs had secured an assignment of the right to sue for bad faith from the underlying defendant who had $50,000 in liability coverage but was hit with a jury verdict that amounted to a little over $1.9 million dollars. [read post]
31 May 2008, 1:55 pm
One bureau source told Threat Level that it was a "gray" area in federal computer security law. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:13 am by David Navetta
”  I also believe they demonstrate the difficulty defendants face if they have to defend their security measures in a litigation context after a security breach. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:55 am
The securities lawsuit was stayed as to the company but proceeded against the individual defendants. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by David Keenan
In a lengthy ruling containing a detailed analysis of dueling economic expert reports, a federal court in Texas held on July 25, 2015 that defendant Halliburton Company demonstrated a lack of price impact at the class-certification stage on nearly all of the plaintiffs’ claims, thus rebutting the presumption of reliance. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The companies named as defendants fall into 52 different Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code categories. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:55 am by Brian Nussbaum
  -     In 2014, around San Francisco, dozens of agencies, organizations and companies took part in a San Francisco Bay Area Cyber Tabletop Exercise sponsored by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Northern California Regional Intelligence Center (NCRIC), and the San Francisco Police Department. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Marc Powers
Stewart’s co-defendant, Peter Baconovic, found in his criminal conviction. [read post]