Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 4,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2025, 2:59 pm
(NEA), section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, DONALD J. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Then Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:31 am
The more state-protective Justices have argued, for example in footnote 9 of Garcia v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 9:29 am
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:06 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The Australian media has been dominated by story about Barnaby Joyce and his affair. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
He does not think that Jarvis has adequately dealt with the question of funding for the media, and ‘how will we fund journalists in a world dominated by Google and Facebook? [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm
The fallout from the revelations about the use of the personal data of Facebook users by Cambridge Analytica continues to dominate the media law news this week. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
BBC and Dominic Casciani v Secretary of State for Justice High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) [2012] EWHC 13 (Admin) January 11, 2012 High Court rules Justice Secretary’s refusal to grant BBC permission to have a face? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am
Barson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Since MHCS’ trade mark has been filed prior to the accession of several Member States to the EU in 2004, 2007 and 2013, MHCS will not have to establish acquired distinctiveness for these ‘new Member States’ (Art. 209(4)(a) EUTMR). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Last Wednesday, legal twittering was dominated by Leveson, the phone hacking settlements (see below), the Harry Redknapp verdict and the “Twitter joke trial“. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
“The State cannot use criminal defamation cases to throttle democracy,” he observed. [read post]
19 May 2025, 1:44 am
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in support of the Attorney General of the state of California, who is defen [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
For example, in Fletcher v. [read post]
