Search for: "Davis v. THE STATE"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 6,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
For support, Judge Davis relied on three Supreme Court cases: United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
Her third-party complaint (full text) in Miller v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:36 pm
The Davis petition mostly raises these issues, so the Court could grant in Davis and just hold Graham for the outcome in Davis. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
”), with State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
The opinion suggests that the state all but conceded that this was the proper outcome of the case under Carey v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:52 am
Earlier today, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit handed down its quite important decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:52 am
Earlier today, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit handed down its quite important decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm
Related Issues: Free SpeechInternationalRelated Cases: Kazakhstan v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Johnson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Jackson and AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:08 pm
”***Remember United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:22 am
Kachina Pipeline Company v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am
Article L.851-3 starts by stating that the processing should not allow the identification of individuals. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
Davis, 954 F.2d 182, 185-86 (4th Cir. 1992); State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 10:59 am
The new policy was prompted in part by an investigation by Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights and a report by the California State Auditor.The policy states in relevant parts:H. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:09 pm
There is some confusion regarding from what case this appeal stems, as Davis was involved in a series of criminal cases: ... [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:27 am
Summary judgment was affirmed (Davis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
