Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 9,567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
See § 1.116(b)(1)–(3). [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
The Court addressed the following four issues: (1) Is the question of whether the Prime Minister’s advice to the Queen was lawful justiciable in a court of law? [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
About one in four women in senior management or executive roles says she does not have a good work/life balance compared with men. 3. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
All documents referred to shall be [...](4) Any part of a party's appeal case which does not meet the requirements in paragraph 2 is to be regarded as an amendment, unless the party demonstrates that this part was admissibly raised and maintained in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:24 am
Walker, 329 U.S. 1 (1946). [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
Sprint Communications Co. 19-211Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:12 pm
Now Amazon truly does have more than a foot in the door to the pharmaceutical market. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
AB 5 and its exemptions go into effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 6:56 am
Similarly, section 18(1) states that the “inherent right of self-government recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 includes jurisdiction in relation to child and family services, including legislative authority in relation to those services and authority to administer and enforce laws made under that legislative authority. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:00 pm
Now Amazon truly does have more than a foot in the door to the pharmaceutical market. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:53 pm
Gov’t (filed on Sept 17, 2019) followed by party briefs within 14 days (October 1, 2019). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:05 am
The USPTO’s interpretation of this provision is set forth in 37 CFR § 1.703(b)(1): (b) The period of adjustment under § 1.702(b) is the number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is three years after the date on which the application was filed under 35 USC 111(a) or the national stage commenced under 35 USC 371(b) or (f) in an international application and ending on the date a patent was issued, but not including the sum… [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:52 am
Whether 35 U.8.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
All this said, however, if a design falls within the scope of the InfoSoc Directive, then the only requirement for copyright protection under this piece of legislation is that the design is a ‘work’ fulfilling requirements 1. and 2. above. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:19 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 6:30 pm
"Suffer the Little Children to Come: The Legal Rights of Unaccompanied Alien Children under United States Federal Court Jurisprudence," International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 31, no. 1 (March 2019)- Preprint version of article. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 6:34 am
Will the MMA law now bring us to that remedy and healing, I surely pray it does? [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:35 pm
Within Marxist-Leninist political organizations, it does represent a significant opening meant to permit popular engagement without appearing to signal an (inevitable) movement toward liberal democratic organization.[14] And, of course, that move toward po [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:10 pm
Therefore, even though the wording of Art 97(5) does not make any reference to a requirement of targeting (as Eleonora Rosati rightly notes), there may at least be some indirect reference to the concept. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 9:26 am
Despite this criticism from the opposition, Trudeau does have some cards up his sleeve. [read post]