Search for: "Felts v. State" Results 2581 - 2600 of 5,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 10:16 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
SALVESON, Plaintiff, -vs- KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Defendant.CIV. 104045UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA2012 U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:01 pm by Bridget Crawford
LEAHY: Have you ever stated whether you felt that it was properly decided or not? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:51 am by Daniel J. Guttman
Some cases set no reasonable expectation of privacy for material posted on the public internet, United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:08 am by Adam Wagner
In FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) court felt that it could not rule on a particularly tricky question of whether because a right of appeal exists against a refusal of an asylum application, European law requires that a right of appeal also be available against a refusal of an application for humanitarian protection  (see the UK Supreme Court Blog’s case preview). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
And it may be good for business--the business of economic enterprises, as well as of the apparatus of the state and that of civil society. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
This proved to be true of Britain as well as the United States. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:30 am by Christopher Schmidt
I felt we need a book dedicated to this important moment in U.S. history. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm
  Finally, the Court held that the shackling of Ayala during her non-jury sentencing was not an abuse of discretion.United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 1:06 pm by Kevin E. Hyde
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (covering Alabama, Florida, and Georgia) declined applying the “association” theory to a Florida state law prohibiting disability discrimination on the basis of association (Carolina Rose Matamoros v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:18 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
See Harvey v Harvey, 470 Mich 186, 194 (2004) (stating that “parties cannot stipulate to circumvent the authority of the circuit court in determining the custody of children”). [read post]