Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:08 am
The State charged Gonzales with two counts of aggravated sexual assault against his eight-year-old daughter. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
The Court, however, held that failure to display a license was not violating an authorized act. [read post]
27 May 2007, 5:50 am
In Washington State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
Los Angeles - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held in Classen Immunotherapies v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Alabama, which held... [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:41 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
The case, Williams v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
On a previous appeal, affirming the denial of defendants' motions to dismiss, inter alia, for failure to state a cause of action, we determined that plaintiffs' expert evidence did not require that a hearing be held in accordance with Frye v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 10:31 pm
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that even where a confession is voluntary, it may not be used in federal court if the defendant was held more than six hourse before confessing. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 5:42 am
In Shagalow v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:05 am
In Scharpen Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:30 am
The Court held (opinion here) that the Treaty of Amity did not provide such a cause of action. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 2:46 am
Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:49 am
Dissenting, Noonan derided the state supreme court's analysis as mechanical and fact-finding as unreasonable.US v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:05 am
Monday, the Fifth Circuit panel that decided Missouri v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:21 am
It held that a showing of a possible or potential communication to federal authorities by the victim was not sufficient for a conviction under the witness-tampering statute. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:07 pm
In Lidow v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
In this case, formerly known as Quila and Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Court of Appeal held that the amendment to the Immigration Rules was disproportionate. [read post]
