Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 2581 - 2600 of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
See Lawsuits Test Crackdown On Sex Criminals, Stateline.org, April 18, 2008; Sex-Offender Residency Laws Get Second Look, USA Today, Feb. 26, 2007. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
In my experience of discussing the law of product-by-process claims with a large number of people, it is important to have in mind the right kind of claim. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law At Take Care, Samuel Bagenstos argues that in Husted v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
§ 1140, permits an employer to discharge an employee for making unsolicited internal complaints regarding violations of the statute.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the American Association of Retired PersonsPetitioner's reply Title: Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 5:43 am
In that case, the artist recouped his legal fees since Mattel kept suing him in violation of his First Amendment rights.A good case on "quoting" copyrighted works is Perfect 10 v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
” (This push gained little traction; but Chief Justice John Roberts, who helped draft the measure as a young administration staffer, would go on to pen the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Herring v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
He had child porn on his machine and lost his daughter. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes remarks that during oral argument in Abbott v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
Do they show that the patent applicant described his claims properly? [read post]