Search for: "In re: Roger"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 3,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 8:40 pm
To quote Kenny Rogers, "You gotta know when to hold 'em, and when to fold 'em. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:40 am
We're all happy to hear it.) [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:52 pm
We're still far better off with them than without them. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 6:56 am
***Of the re-exam of the WARF patents by FTCR and PubPat, note the post at setiathome:"WARF was not the first to do human embryonic stem cell research," said Dan Ravicher, of the Public Patent Foundation. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:47 pm
"Now, we're just throwing a bunch of things out to the wall and seeing what sticks. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm
If you're the government, the court will raise the argument for you. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
Oprendek (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB: Use of term with a highly successful product does not mean the term has acquired distinctiveness: In re Apple (IPBiz) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Puerto 80 – EFF urges Appeals Court to scrutinize seizure campaign (EFF) [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Rogers v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Ainsi, cette obligation n’est pas tempérée par la règle de l’appréciation commerciale et c’est à bon droit que le juge a conclu que seule une modification législative pourrait permettre à Air Canada de déroger à cette obligation. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
The first was a question in which he suggested that Bell and Rogers do not have a dominant position in Ontario, something that will be news to the overwhelming majority of broadband subscribers in the province. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:06 am
Marlene Gebauer 2:06 Yes, thank you very much, Roger. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:06 am
Marlene Gebauer 2:06 Yes, thank you very much, Roger. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:20 pm
And I have a second question: What makes you think that you’re not being scammed? [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Although Tam rejected that argument, some of the Court seemed to have buyer’s remorse in Brunetti, recognizing that almost all of TM law is content based; if we’re going to have a registration system at all, we need to make some content based distinctions. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
You can click on any of the links below to go straight to the part you're most interested in:Effective App Store commission ("App Store tax") rate peaks at 35.25% (plus annual developer program fee plus Search Ads) -- a relative increase by 17.5%IP-related issues surrounding web appsRecent United States Senate hearing: mixed blessing for Epic's caseStatement of Objections from the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) in the… [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Got Indiana to pass very favorable law and promotes it elsewhere.Limiting mechanisms: fair use (copyright); federal publicity statute; constitutional limitations including full faith and credit; Rogers test from Lanham Act; or something else? [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers: we are faced with a specific problem, and rely on the lawyers to frame the issues. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
FDA says: we’re still the arbiter; proceed at your own risk. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:36 pm
But they’re not. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 10:05 am
Rogers defense even suggests that infringement actions can cover noncommercial speech in certain circumstances. [read post]
