Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 2581 - 2600 of 3,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Today the Court released its decisi0n in HHS v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:22 pm by Joy Waltemath
Saying she “just didn’t like the idea of two men working together,” this one comment of a case manager who later became a male hospice nurse’s supervisor, and then terminated him, was enough for a district court to deny summary judgment, finding a fact question as to pretext even though there was ample evidence the employee had been counseled for tardiness, policy violations, and rudeness to coworkers (Lianoz v Hospice of Humboldt). [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
This is a lunacy, it may be fixed by the district court itself in the post-trial proceedings, and if not, the Federal Circuit can still solve the problem. [read post]
18 May 2022, 12:35 pm by Katherine Pompilio
   Rohini Kurup and Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH(The 1709 Copyright Blog) ECJ: upholds ‘compulsory licences’ of Green Dot trade mark: Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (JIPLP) ECJ: Manifest inadmissibility of reference for preliminary ruling in Canon Kabushiki Kaisha (C-181/09) (Class 46) (IPKat) Bud court asks ECJ: what is ‘acquiesced’? [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
The magistrate judge ordered arbitration, but the district court reversed. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:41 pm
In a November 5 decision, federal district judge Barbara Jones found that Citi, as the protection buyer, was entitled by the contract to collect additional collateral from VCG. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Steve Lombardi
The district court follows these same principles on a motion for directed verdict. ? [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
However, the District Court did acknowledge that the Supreme Court in Dastar Corp. v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp (2003) ( a subsection section (A) case) held that 'origin' refers to "the producer of the tangible goods that are offered for sale, and not the author of any idea, concept or communication embodied in those goods. [read post]