Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 2581 - 2600 of 35,333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am by John Floyd
Supreme Court in June 1992 established the “Daubert Rule” in its landmark decision Daubert v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
Most states have rules or law that looks similar to federal law, but state judges, not uncommonly, look for ways to avoid their institutional responsibilities. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am by Jamelle C. Sharpe
Yaira Dubin, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Consider the reforms of Solon and then of Cleisthenes in Athens, the outcome of the Social War in Rome, and of course the Reconstruction Amendments, the expansion of the franchise to women, and similar moments in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
  COVID-19 COVID-19 has infected over 101.958 million people and has now killed over 1.10 million people in the United States, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Its in-house adjudicative proceeding does not prevent the merger from closing.This is the order on the motion to stay and the next deadlines and hearing dates:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Office of the Marshal Supreme Court of the United States Washington, D.C. 20543. [read post]
Assistant Solicitor General Anthony Yang was present arguing on behalf of the United States in support of Perez. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 241 to prosecute conspiracies against the free exercise of the right to vote, constituted fair warning under the controlling standard from United States v. [read post]