Search for: "Juri v. Juri" Results 2581 - 2600 of 46,301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 8:42 am by michael
Regina v Thompson, Regina v Crawford, Regina v Gomulu, Regina v Allen, Regina v Blake, Regina v Kasunga; [2010] EWCA Crim 1623; [2010] WLR (D) 183 “The collective responsibility of the jury was not confined to the verdict. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:02 pm
State deals with whether, by running Barrow's two individual sentences consecutively, the trial court violated his constitutional right to a jury trial as set forth in Apprendi v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Over Intestinal Perforation Results in Jury Verdict for Surgeon $3.1 Million Jury Verdict for Death of Patient Following Heart Procedure; Estate of Teague v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While plaintiff can succeed where there has been a total shutout in the actual outcome (and can show that a reasonable jury would have awarded some recovery), here in Bei Yang v Pagan Law Firm, P.C. 2024 NY Slip Op 03394 [228 AD3d 547] June 20, 2024Appellate Division, First Department the speculation was too great in trying to show that a reasonable jury would have awarded more than $ 1.3 million for the injuries. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:52 am by Kirk Jenkins
During the May term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kakos v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 2:39 pm
The jury returned a verdict for Trading Technologies, finding infringement and awarding $3.5M for software sold by eSpeed over six months in 2004. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:08 pm by Sarah Lindsey
”  In Nelson v Dubose, the Court of Appeals held the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion for JNOV after the jury found the plaintiff had not suffered a serious impairment of bodily function. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:21 pm by Narendra Ghosh
Earlier this month, the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued Kornegay v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm by Michael O'Hear
A defendant’s right to reasonably competent legal representation is violated when the defendant’s lawyer discriminates on the basis of gender during jury selection, the Seventh Circuit ruled last week in Winston v. [read post]