Search for: "Lock v. State"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 3,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2016, 9:47 am
The Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Berger v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
The source of this specter lies not in anyone's crystal ball but in the history of U.S. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:26 am
Lock up the women and children! [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm
In Luxottica Group SpA. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
” That fight went all the way to the Supreme Court, resulting in 2020 in a watershed ruling for public access to primary legal materials, Georgia v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
—Jean Rhys, Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) A prisoner in isolation or solitary confinement spends the vast majority of the day locked inside a prison cell. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) New Practice Note PAN 01/09 on trade mark registrations for ‘shopping centre services’ (Class 46) (IPKat) United States US General Seattle’s Gary Locke may become new Commerce Secretary (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Inventive Step) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Hal Wegner) International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) calls for… [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
I mean, you're --but what about the -the --the combination to the lock on the safe? [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
Moreover, contrary to its claims, Apple has repeatedly increased prices after developers and consumers were locked in, including by requiring use of Apple’s IAP to process payments for in-app digital content (2009); requiring IAP for subscriptions (2011); and charging developers for search ads (2016). [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
Subsequent to our decision, Respondents filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the United States Supreme Court decided Cavazos v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Ezendam B.V. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
It would be hard to find a business dissolution case with messier facts and thornier legal issues than Tal v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
Although the legal premise for such cases arose in the 1980s (see, for example State (O’Connell) v Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362 and Murphy v DPP [1989] I.L.R.M. 71) real interest in the “missing evidence” concept as a method to seek to force the prohibition of an impending trial did not gather pace until the early 2000s. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
Budai v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
Budai v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
The petition said the rulings incorrectly applied the Court's 2004 decision in Locke v. [read post]
