Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2581 - 2600 of 4,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
On the first day Pill LJ ruled that the evidence from the recent “Panorama” programme about Lord Ashcroft was inadmi [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:10 pm
In the state of New York, a dog can be described as vicious even if the current case is the first time that the dog has ever bitten anyone. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:18 pm
      Corporate VeilIt is as easy to state that the origin of the separate entity principle is often traced to Salomon v Salomon as it is difficult to outline when a court will lift the veil. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile, the Lord Chief Justice of England announced guidelines for twittering in court. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:46 am by Alasdair Henderson
However, in fact it is possible that the UK courts could take a more generous view of human rights protections in a given case than Strasbourg would (see, for example, some Article 9 cases such as R(Begum) v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 30 January  2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
As the Telegraph reports, details of Lord Mandelson’s visit to a Siberian steam ‘banya‘ were disclosed during Rothschild v Associated Newspapers, heard last week by Tugendhat J, without a jury. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:52 am by William Carleton
But it's also a reminder to not expect too much of United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am by Rebecca Griffiths, Olswang
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm
(v) were 32Red's Community marks and United Kingdom trade marks valid;? [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:09 am by 1 Crown Office Row
(Tickell is also correct that this represents a much lower “rate of defeat” for the UK than some other Contracting States.) [read post]