Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 36,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
Co.], 43 AD3d 1439, 1439, quoting Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 10:57 am
Werynski v Mediatel 4B spólka z o o (Case C-283/09); [2011] WLR (D) 50 “In respect of acts which had been adopted in the field of Title IV of the EC Treaty, since December 1 2009 the Court of Justice of the European Union has had jurisdiction to hear and determine a reference for a preliminary ruling from a court against whose decision there was a judicial remedy under national law even where the reference was lodged prior to that date. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:22 am
Crimson AV, LLC, No. 11 C 1768, Slip Op. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:34 am
., No. 05 C 3449, Slip Op. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Kanye West, No. 10 C 3951, Slip Op. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
C 06-06685 CRB (N.D.Cal. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 4:24 am
Defense Threat Reduction Agency, No. 07 C 1688, 2007 WL 2404625 (N.D. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 8:29 am
Wrongful denial of a pedicure is no laughing matter. [read post]
The "American Rule" Rules: Court Declines to Compel Defendants to Share Cost of Plaintiffs' Subpoena
4 Jan 2012, 11:30 am
AGS Specialist Partners, No. 04 C 0397, 2011 WL 6097769 (N.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:29 am
By Mary C. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
., No. 07 C 2758, 2008 WL 4200888 (N.D. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:23 am
., No. 09 C 2132, Slip Op. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 3:57 am
., No. 07 C 6357, 2008 WL 373217 (N.D. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:05 am
Johnson & Johnson, No. 04 C 6216, Slip Op. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:31 am
Wyche d/b/a DGSource.com, No. 10 C 748, Slip Op. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:27 pm
., No. 10 C 1863, Slip Op. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 11:18 pm
Fred C. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:45 pm
Answer: (a) To would-be clients in situations where you take more time than usual to evaluate the matter they bring to you before saying no, (b) unsophisticated users of legal services or, and most likely, (c) crazy people who might tend to rely on your legal representation going forward despite the fact that you have declined the representation. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:59 pm
Answer: (a) To would-be clients in situations where you take more time than usual to evaluate the matter they bring to you before saying no, (b) to unsophisticated users of legal services or, and most likely, (c) to crazy people who might tend to rely on your legal representation going forward despite the fact that you have declined the representation. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:59 pm
Answer: (a) To would-be clients in situations where you take more time than usual to evaluate the matter they bring to you before saying no, (b) to unsophisticated users of legal services or, and most likely, (c) to crazy people who might tend to rely on your legal representation going forward despite the fact that you have declined the representation. [read post]
