Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
While claiming to merely “clarify” its prior precedents on the matter, and acknowledging no major break with the longstanding Arthur Andersen fee-factors framework, the Texas high court will have accomplished much more. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
”[6] Goodstein invokes his own experience as a peer reviewer to note that “peer review referees and editors limit their assessment of submitted articles to such matters as style, plausibility, and defensibility; they do not duplicate experiments from scratch or plow through reams of computer-generated data in order to guarantee accuracy or veracity or certainty. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm
It does not matter where the trade mark had been applied to, or in relation to, the relevant goods. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
White’s loss of his election amounted to a procedural error under s. 536(2) of the Criminal Code, the Provincial Court retained jurisdiction to hear the matter, since the court had jurisdiction “over the class of offence” under s. 686(1)(b)(iv). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:48 am
Tara Copp and Lolita C. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Attorney for the District of New Jersey; and Michael B. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
However under the tests set out by Arden J in Hanoman v Southwark L B C [2008] AER(D) 146 [para 47] (our note here), there was a collateral contract in this case, “The terms of the collateral contract can be gleaned from the documents signed by Miss Scrowther, the letter sent by Mr Botsford on 3rd October 2006 and the FAQs and the fact that Miss Scrowther signed the authority and paid over the £31,250 to Watermill on completion”. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
ICBC, 2005 BCSC 602; c. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination? [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:22 am
Select 'A' for Carrie Underwood, 'B' for Kelly Clarkson, or 'C' for Ryan Seacrest. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:38 am
In Matter of Capital Enters. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
B. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
" Philip C. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination? [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 1:15 am
The Superior Court Ruling As discussed here, in March 2017, Judge William C. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 12:11 pm
(…) the essential components extracted from Sedleigh-Denfield and Page supra were that (a) the defendant was aware of the nuisance or should, with ordinary and reasonable care, have become aware of it, (b) the defendant was able to take reasonable steps to abate the nuisance, and (c) the defendant did not take those steps within a reasonable time or at all. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:01 am
J. 81 (2006), which can be found here, I analyzed the issue of whether deductions are mandatory, and in doing so, focused on the meanings of the words "allowed" and "allowable. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
The claimant intends to take the matter to the Federal Constitutional Court. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
G.S. 132-1.4(j). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
McMurtry and J. [read post]
