Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
* BREAKING NEWS: someone wants to register 'Je suis Charlie' as a trade mark…and it is not Charlie Hebdo, explains Eleonora. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:50 am
Typical grounds include: (a) likelihood of confusion with a preexisting trademark registration or common law rights of the Opposer; (b) the Applicant’s mark, when used in association with the goods, is merely descriptive and thus not capable of registration on the Principal Register; and (c) the Applicant had a lack of bona-fide intent to use its mark on some or all of the goods at the time of the filing of its application. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:15 pm
QTK Internet c/o James M. van Johns, FA0905001261364 (Nat. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:27 am
To remind readers, the question referred was: ‘Are non-Community goods bearing a Community trade mark which are subject to customs supervision in a Member State and which are in transit from a non-Member State to another non-Member State capable of constituting ‘counterfeit goods’ within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation 1383/2003 if there is no evidence to suggest that those goods will be put on the mark in the EU,… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am
322/10 Medeva v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks and C? [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 11:36 am
Mark Humphrey-Jenner's paper Anti-Takeover Provisions as a Source of Innovation and Value Creation argues for an affirmative answer in some cases: Managers are risk averse. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
So far so good. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Caldwell Gifts - By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Lawyer Mark J. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:18 am
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been some recent buzz about this court decision, In the Matter of C (Romford County Ct. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm
Applying the six non-exhaustive dilution factors of Section 43(c)(2)(B), the Board concluded that “an association exists between the parties’ marks that would impair the distinctiveness of opposer’s famous mark. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
To distinguish abusive domain name registrations from legitimate ones, the ACPA directs courts to consider nine nonexhaustive factors: the trademark or other intellectual property rights of the person, if any, in the domain name; the extent to which the domain name consists of the legal name of the person or a name that is otherwise commonly used to identify that person; the person’s prior use, if any, of the domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of any goods or… [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
Indeed, Lincoln and FDR, who presided over two of the most important wars in our history, receive good marks for their job as commander in chief. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Never underestimate the value of a good domain name! [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 11:24 am
I have a reputation for taking on challenging cases and almost always finding a good offer. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:21 am
A national measure under which, in the case of such an infringement, the trade mark proprietor is entitled to claim financial remedies on the same basis as if the goods had been spurious, is not in itself contrary to the principle of proportionality. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Mark A. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Send us postcards at Ruth and Rob, c/o Venjuris P.C., 1938 E. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Send us postcards at Ruth and Rob, c/o Venjuris P.C., 1938 E. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 12:22 am
The Code defines a franchise agreement as: ... an agreement: (a) that takes the form, in whole or part, of any of the following: (i) a written agreement; (ii) an oral agreement; (iii) an implied agreement; and (b) in which a person (the franchisor) grants to another person (the franchisee) the right to carry on the business of offering, supplying or distributing goods or services in Australia under a system or marketing plan substantially determined, controlled or… [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 8:44 pm
Consequently, physical limitations that still exist beyond the one-year mark are more probably than not permanent. [read post]
