Search for: "People v Challenger" Results 2581 - 2600 of 18,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2014, 6:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Judge Friedman concluded his 30-page opinion in very plain terms:In attempting to define this case as a challenge to the 'will of the people', state defendants lost sight of what this case is really about: people. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm by Unknown
Blog posts & press:Bureaucratic Gaps and Exclusion: The Limits of Documentary ‘Protection’ for Rohingyas in India (Kaldor Centre, Dec. 2020) [text]Coronavirus Reaches the World’s Most Persecuted People: The Threat of COVID-19 in the Rohingya Refugee Camps (Refugee Research Online, Nov. 2020) [text]Human Rights Metaphors: Revealing Regional Perspectives about Rohingya Displacement since the Andaman Sea Crisis (Kaldor Centre, Dec. 2020) [text]"Rohingya Refugees… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She added that tens of thousands of people had been rejected from the registration rolls because of the Arizona law, though there was no evidence that they were not citizens. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:18 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2015] CSIH 64 The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal, in a case where four registered charities with interests in family matters and three individual parents challenged the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2012, which made provision for a named person to be assigned to each child and young person in Scotland. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:31 am by Tim Zubizarreta
This case asked whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people either inherently as being transgender or under the sex stereotyping decision in the earlier Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:51 am by Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie
For reasons best known to it, it did not take steps to be joined in the suit to challenge MCSN’s claims in respect of its works. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
But the law challenged in Heller was a gun ban, so it makes sense that guns would be the Court’s primary focus. [read post]