Search for: "People v Person" Results 2581 - 2600 of 31,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The court based its findings on, among other evidence, two expert reports and it found that Terentyev had negatively influenced public opinion “with the aim of inciting social hatred and enmity, escalating social conflict and controversy in society and awakening base instincts in people”, calling for the “physical extermination” of police officers by ordinary people. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
It will be much more useful for those on a mission to harvest for the purpose of ensuring a more efficient way of managing people, views, beliefs, cognition, etc. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am by INFORRM
(He was also convicted of four counts of possessing information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism – these convictions were not addressed in the appeal). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm by MBettman
Constitution (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.) [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by John Day
A New York Appellate Court has ruled in Patterson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 4:06 pm by John Bellinger
  EO-3 may also violate the First Amendment by discriminating on the basis of religion, but our amici argue that Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by Jeanne Long
  They heard voices and people running inside the house, and, through a basement window, they could see empty bottles of alcohol and people trying to hide. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm by Orin Kerr
If two people are sharing a space and both have privacy rights there, one person can consent to a search of the shared space over the rights of the other because he has “common authority” to consent, see United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
Two decisions -- People v Battaglia (56 NY2d 558 [1982], reversing on dissent of Hancock, Jr., J. at 82 AD2d 389) and People v Hicks (68 NY2d 234 [1986]) - - have appeared to be in conflict. [read post]