Search for: "People v. Smith"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 3,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Congress didn't want people to have to jump through a bunch of hoops just to prove what federal administrative agencies have said. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:34 am
The Court of Appeals' 5-1 decision in Walton v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:57 am
John Bartlow Martin’s The Deep South Says Never documented the rise of the White Citizens’ Council movement in opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am
ACLU says California DNA law violates privacy [San Francisco Chronicle] Haskell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
I could not do so entirely, as at least some of my scholarship might give me away; But at least I had the protection that people actually had to read it to realize that.Anybody applying for the Fed Soc fellowship should know that while it might help you in all of the ways that other strong and high quality fellowships can, it also can be and often is seen as a black mark by many people in the legal professoriate.Of course, if it’s already obvious that you are “on the… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
The Sydney Morning Herald had a piece “Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial delayed”. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Smith of a “reasonable probability that at least one juror would have struck a different balance” on whether to punish by death; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
On 13 December 2022, Saini J heard argument in the case of Smith v Talk Talk Telecom (QB-2020-003019). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:14 am
Smith and Circuit Judge James L. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
UNITED STATES v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
People of Freedom – known as PDL (Popolo della Libertà) – symbol (Class 46) Kenya Kenya’s Anti-counterfeit Agency comes out with blazing guns (Afro-IP) Netherlands District Court of The Hague – Tédé v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
The altruism some people would substitute for it may, when it has arrived, bring with it a higher sense of justice but it has not arrived. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
In fact, this is a well established procedures and such injunctions have been granted in cases such as Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown [2015] EWHC 2628 (QB) and Smith v Unknown Defendant [2016] EWHC 1775 (QB). [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm
“In the 2024 annual report released today, the CECC once again stands with the Chinese people against the Chinese Communist Party,” said CECC Chair Smith. [read post]
