Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 2,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
Holder (09-60). [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:48 pm
Capital Records, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
Registration Sys. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
The benefits touted by the ‘062 patent include advantages in the areas of latency, reliability, power consumption and cross platform compatibility. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
InfoUSA invokes the propitious power of common sense in case law. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:22 am
And the justices said they wouldn't use their common law powers to do it either. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
And the justices said they wouldn't use their common law powers to do it either. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
A licence-holder had such powers in respect of a customer, so for a constable’s powers only to be those of arrest in those circumstances would make no sense. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:04 pm
Espinosa relies on Traveler's Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:01 pm
In a case now pending before the Supreme Court (Holder v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Holder, 626 F. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:54 pm
But the government told a federal judge that the agreement threatens to give Google the power to increase book prices and discourage competition. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:24 pm
Such beliefs have provoked powerful resistance in the US to human rights approaches that view the child as an independent rights holder and the state as obligated to proved services and protections that are distinctly child-centred. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:12 pm
On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court concluded that Kahn v. [read post]
