Search for: "S. Sherman" Results 2581 - 2600 of 5,993
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s inference from the letter that there was a “substantial unanimity of action” among the letter’s writer and its addressees. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s inference from the letter that there was a “substantial unanimity of action” among the letter’s writer and its addressees. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s inference from the letter that there was a “substantial unanimity of action” among the letter’s writer and its addressees. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:13 pm by Bill Marler
Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 10:04 am by Amar Naik
Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (2004), Justice Scalia limited the breadth of the Sherman Act when he held that Verizon’s alleged failure to carry out its network-sharing duties under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 did not give rise to antitrust claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
"Roger Sherman : I once yada yada yada'd the price of hogs I was bringing to market. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 5:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
” Certainly not the administration of justice’s. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:44 am by Jonathan H. Adler
November 1939 — Pierce Butler, filled in 1940 by Frank Murphy. 1956 — Sherman Minton, filled in 1957 by William Brennan (though seat initially filled by recess appointment in 1956). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Michigan 14-824Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by musicandcopyright
US court declares big is not bad in Live Nation IMP market abuse case A US Fourth Circuit appeals court has affirmed a previous district court ruling that global event promoter Live Nation has not violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by engaging in monopolization, tying arrangements, and exclusive dealing in the music concert industry. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:31 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
The only other time an election year nomination went through the Senate without a clear majority for the president’s party was in 1956, when Democratic Justice Sherman Minton announced on September 7, just two months before the upcoming presidential election, that he would be retiring on October 15. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
Also, the California Supreme Court’s decision to publish Sherman (it was originally unpublished) is taken as a sign that Sherman is preferable to Bono. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Kathleen Hennessey and Mark Sherman report for AP:"The Supreme Court has not reflected where the American people have been on issues," said Gregory Craig, who served as White House counsel early in Obama's first term. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 6:48 pm
Steven Mufson and Juliet Eilperin of The Washington Post report that "Battle over Scalia's replacement already spilling into Senate races. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:24 pm
"Scalia's death means loss of key vote in divided cases": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 8:55 pm by Amy Howe
On September 7, 1956, Sherman Minton announced his intent to retire in a letter to President Dwight D. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm by News Desk
NRA’s one million restaurants employ an estimated 14 million food service workers. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 8:44 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The claims asserted against Oracle were identical to the claims brought against Microsoft in Ryan – that Oracle violated:  (1) Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
 Under the Sherman Act, “any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws . . . shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. [read post]