Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 17,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
Ivory issue (applying Apprendi to facts of criminal history)State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:23 pm
Consider a case like United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Cupek v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 7:55 pm
United States, 530 U.S. 255, 261 (2000); see also Bridge v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:42 am
Cooper v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Hage v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 10:30 am
Plaintiff asserted claims for defamation (Counts I and II), false light invasion of privacy (Count III), public disclosure of private facts (Count IV), and unjust enrichment (Count V), and he argued that "[t]his Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:10 pm
(Hsu v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
On appeal, the Government conceded that Cesare improperly received concurrent sentences in violation of double jeopardy because bank robbery is a lesser included offense of armed bank robbery, but argued that the two separate $100 special assessments be left intact because special assessments are not punishment.The Third Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 4:24 pm
Mark V. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:52 am
In Fenimore v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:37 am
Politics Wires has a piece on United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm
” Needless to say, ancient authorities count for more in law than in medicine, but my understanding is that medicine has not reached a different result than that given in the report of United States v. [read post]
U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Federal Torts Claim Act Dismissal Stating that Equitable Tolling Applied
26 May 2015, 5:32 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 3:45 am
Ortiz-Marquez, holding that dismissal without prejudice for failure to state a claim counts as a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which limits prisoners’ ability to file lawsuits without paying the filing fees. [read post]
