Search for: "STATE v. WISE" Results 2581 - 2600 of 3,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2010, 6:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Connoisseurs of verbal abuse may, however, wonder whether it was wise to attach the label "praetorian" which at least to English readers has implications of dishonesty, corruption and perhaps subversion to the former Swiss form claim practice whose acceptance by the national courts of the EU contracting states was at times grudging. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am by Peter Kinder
Hall, ed., Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (New York: Oxford Univ. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 6:30 am by Avery T. "Sandy" Waterman, Jr., Esq.
Cir. 197, 200 ( Wise Sep. 15, 1989) found the “general allegation of negligence is sufficient”. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
Chicago, which considers whether the 2nd amendment should be incorporated to the states United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:24 pm by B.W. Barnett
In perusing the recently published cases of the various Texas Courts of Appeals, I came across Powell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm by Terry Lenamon
Faced with the problem of how to provide legal counsel to those who cannot afford to hire their own attorney after Gideon v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by Adam Thierer
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:32 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
Collins, for example, describes one of her first oral arguments, in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:39 am
Therefore, if charged with a crime, obtaining legal representation is a wise decision ... [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:41 pm by Diane Polscer
In our opinion, other states’ courts would be wise to follow its course. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:01 pm by James F. Aspell
The Connecticut Appellate Court released it's decison on December 1, 2009 in the case of MARJORIE VORONUK v. [read post]