Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2581 - 2600 of 6,068
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2015, 9:57 am by Orin Kerr
It’s a pretty limited exception, as it only authorizes monitoring of the hacker’s own communications with the consent of the network operator. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
  Not this time, and thus the sale and use of prescription drugs became subject to a “racketeering” statute. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
It also held that the disputes regarding the plaintiff’s failure to strictly comply with the mortgage or G.L. c. 244 § 35A were not the types of claims that would render the foreclosure void ab initio. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:54 am by Lax & Neville LLP
The Complaint charges the various defendants with the following offenses: (i) unregistered offer and sale of securities, in violation of Sections 5(a) and 9(c) of the Securities Act; (ii) failure to file beneficial ownership reports in violation of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1 and 13d-2 thereunder; (iii) failure to file beneficial ownership reports in violation of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 16a-3 thereunder; (iv) fraud in connection with the… [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
Some individuals have stepped forward to do that with respect to the intellectual property and e-commerce chapters, such as: Nathaniel Lipkus The TPP’s IP provisions put Canada on level ground Richard C. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Code § 6c(a)(5)(C) Knowing violation of the anti-spoofing provision is a felony. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:23 pm by Michael W. Huseman
Huseman verbally authorized a man named Vernon C. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Narayana c. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
” That’s how the Maryland Court of Appeals — that state’s highest court — in Bontempo v Lares, 444 Md. 344 [2015], recently referred to the remedy of judicial dissolution made available by statute in most states, including New York, to oppressed minority shareholders of closely held corporations. [read post]