Search for: "State, in Interest of Jr" Results 2581 - 2600 of 5,807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 7:07 am by Ronald Collins
If you are a Supreme Court watcher, several new or forthcoming books will be of special interest to you. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:28 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Benjamin Wittes
Recall that the competitors were asked to nominate the "most interesting, vulnerable, hackable, unclassified database in the United States government. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:44 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Bove, Jr., as explained in a 2012 ACTEC article entitled The Case Against the Trust Protector. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:59 am by Lax & Neville LLP
Kruse Jr. of Miami and Canada-based mining company, Everock, Inc., which involve the artificial inflation of stock prices. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
(a) The Legislature finds that: (1) It is in the best interests of the state to encourage owners of private real property to continue to make their lands available for public recreational use to supplement opportunities available on tax-supported publicly owned facilities [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:26 am by Law Office of James J. Falcone
(a) The Legislature finds that: (1) It is in the best interests of the state to encourage owners of private real property to continue to make their lands available for public recreational use to supplement opportunities available on tax-supported publicly owned facilities [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. prophetically stated in his dissent from the infamous 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:37 am
Dorsey Henderson, Jr. will function in that role.There is a timeline of the Diocese's and Bishop's various dealings and interactions with the St. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
To shrink Lord Kerr’s opinion to its core: “There is, at the least, a possible tension between the application of a reasonable expectation of privacy test and the well-established principle that any decision affecting a child should give prominence to his or her best interests”. [read post]