Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 29,278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:47 pm
Cir. 2023), highlights the current state of the law. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 3:31 am
(My article on Cooper v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
’” West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm
" Whitman v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 11:51 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 11:20 am
Keep an eye out on other things: GOP-controlled House looking to cut IRS funding (see, e.g., House Republicans vote to strip IRS funding, following pledge to repeal nearly $80 billion approved by Congress, CNBC, 1/10/23) FEC updated rule on Internet ad disclaimers and the meaning of “public communication” Foreign Agents Registration Act – see FARA: A Guide for the Perplexed (Covington) Internet ad disclaimers – draft Final Rule and Explanation and… [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am
Domestic Law / Atrocity Crimes Congress Should Close the ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Loophole by Ambassador David Scheffer and Kristin Smith Detention Repatriating Alleged ISIS-Linked Men from Northeast Syria: The Start of Judicial Responses to the Political Stalemate by Fionnuala Ní Aoláin (@NiAolainF) and Anne Charbod (@ACharbod) Supreme Court / Social Media Regulation Mapping the Key Arguments in Supreme Court Amicus Briefs in Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm
In Pollock v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
The distinction between relied upon, and admissible, studies is codified in the Federal Rules of Evidence, and in virtually every state’s evidence law. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Republic of Germany v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 8:36 am
Yet, even Congress has passed laws allowing each state to regulate insurance as the state seems fit to do. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:05 am
[fails] because [Congress] . . . reversed the alleged policy or practice . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:12 am
In Arellano v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:30 am
At the time, I thought this federalism case was not a difficult call: Congress cannot prohibit a state from legalizing sports betting. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
In Taamneh v. [read post]
