Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
In an opinion filed September 6, and later ordered published on October 7, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying plaintiff groups’ writ petition challenging Sonoma County’s use permit and related mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a winery project in the County’s rural Knights Valley area. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:31 am
The letter cited to a 2018 ruling at the European Court of Human Rights, Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 5:30 am
On appeal, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals stated the case was “an issue of first impression” despite that the United States Supreme Court provided some statutory guidance in Intel Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 6:43 pm
The ruling was reversed on appeal, with the First District Court of Appeal directing the ALJ to reduce the lien to $11,828.01. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
In the England & Wales High Court's Unwired Planet v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
With his complaint, Frese incorporated records from the New Hampshire Judicial Branch evidencing how infrequently criminal defamation charges have been brought in each New Hampshire district court. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm
Kevin Pastel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York signed the emergency judicially decreed temporary restraining order, and also granted the SEC expedited discovery and other emergency relief. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court later held that the Tenure Act as unconstitutional in Myers v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
And in 1971, the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that sex-based classifications in state laws must be subjected to heightened judicial scrutiny—and were thus likely to be held unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 7:00 pm
At the outset, the court noted that “when two cases involving the same parties and issues are filed in two federal districts, the first-to-file rule permits the second district to exercise its discretion to transfer, stay, or dismiss the second suit in the interests of efficiency and judicial economy. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
We will go back to district court. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
District Court, in which the court addressed its jurisdiction upon removal of the case from state court. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 1:38 pm
Walden v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 12:56 pm
The court will also wade into the immigration arena in Nasrallah v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Section 145 (filing a civil action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia). [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
