Search for: "State v. M. V." Results 2581 - 2600 of 29,339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
I'm fairly confident that what Justice Robie says in this opinion about both the applicable law and the existence of prejudice accurately states the existing doctrine.But should it really be this way? [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:42 pm
  So the domestic application of that principle perhaps isn't too surprising.Though I'm not sure that the framers, with their heightened sense of state sovereignty, would have thought that the Constitution enshrined that principle to the degree currently interpreted.Regardless, that's where we are. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:21 pm
  Which means, under state policy, that we'll conduct the test in a couple of months or so. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the CCAs:  On Tuesday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) S & Anor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 2177 (09 October 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals (RSPCA), R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2008] EWHC 2321 (Admin) (07 October 2008) High Court (Family  Division) M & Anor (Children) [2008] EWHC 2281 (Fam) (06 October 2008)  … [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:45 am
The trial court found first that the matter was not controlled by state law (concerning the definition of duty). [read post]