Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 2581 - 2600 of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Florida International University Board of Trustees v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 4:46 am by John L. Welch
Section 1071(b) of the TTAB's October 30, 2009 ruling in Christopher Brooks v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
"Abortion, death penalty wins slow in coming on state-by-state basis," is Mark Pattison's report via Baltimore's Catholic Review.If Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The fabrication of counterfeit money, whether coin or paper, counterfeit titles or coupons of public debt, created by National, State, Provincial, Territorial, Local or Municipal Governments, bank notes or other instruments of public credit, counterfeit seals, stamps, dies and marks of State or public administrations, and the utterance, circulation or fraudulent use of the above mentioned objects. 15. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The fabrication of counterfeit money, whether coin or paper, counterfeit titles or coupons of public debt, created by National, State, Provincial, Territorial, Local or Municipal Governments, bank notes or other instruments of public credit, counterfeit seals, stamps, dies and marks of State or public administrations, and the utterance, circulation or fraudulent use of the above mentioned objects. 15. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
 In a decision widely considered the high-water mark of state-action doctrine, Shelley v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
It is about a business that got a bunch of trade marks covering the somewhat unregistrable word "supreme", and then decided to bring proceedings against a defendant who wasn't using the word as a trade mark and whose use of it went back 20 years, recounts Jeremy.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO v EPO [on… [read post]