Search for: "State v. Miles" Results 2581 - 2600 of 3,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am by Jeff Welty
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As Richard Epstein explained some years ago in connection with the Supreme Court's decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:15 pm
Ted Frank has a good round up of analysis on the potential problems spots at Point of Law; And Howard Erichson reports on a plaintiffs-only conference to discuss the settlement;From the miscellaneous category: New York State practitioners should take note of a reversal in Raffellini v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 6:56 am by apricotlaw
State police are still investigating exactly what happened, but the truck hit the first car, a Honda CR-V, hard enough to flip it onto its roof. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
    Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by Trent Dykes
The complaint alleged that the noncompete provision prevented former employees from practicing “aesthetic medicine” within 20 miles of any company location for 24 months following their termination and further obligated them to repay training costs in the event of a violation of the noncompete period. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
Norwood, a felon with a long criminal history who lived about 12 miles from the Mortons at the time of the murder. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
He quoted Judge Newman of the Second Circuit, who stated that factual copying and actionable copying are not coextensive concepts. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]