Search for: "United States v. Mannings" Results 2581 - 2600 of 6,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) In a recently-filed amicus brief submitted by Oracle America Inc. before the en banc Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:15 am by SHG
  But that’s in the United States of America. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am by Harold O'Grady
Sharpe); holding that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that it is unconstitutional to execute insane people who cannot understand why they are being put to death or that their execution is imminent. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”This is why a few European courts have recently refused to extradite American criminals.Last year a Scottish judge took the extraordinary step of refusing to send a man accused of aggravated assault in Texas back to that state. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
A more likely interpertation is, that materials purchased for mass production of such videos crossed state lines, is what Congress had in mind, not the construction used to charge Blum in this case.For reasons that are a mystery to this writer, it seens this was not brought up on appeal, and the appeals court went off on a tangent of possession of child porn, see appellate court decision: USA -v- Gregory Blum . [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960) While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, it can lead to the fruition of a number of expectancies embodied in the concept of "property" expectancies that, if sufficiently important, the Government must condemn and pay for before it takes over the management of the landowner's property. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:24 am
Speaker, that the scope and meaning of the limitations imposed by the first section, fourteenth amendment of the Constitution may be more fully understood, permit me to say that the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, as contradistinguished from the citizens of a State, are chiefly defined in the first eight amendments to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]