Search for: "Way v. Superior Court" Results 2581 - 2600 of 4,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2018, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
Superior Court (1996) 13 Cal.4th 893, 937), that does not extend to situations which have a substantial impact on residents’ use and enjoyment of their separate interests. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Shahram Miri
Roger's case weaved its way through the California court system before eventually ending up in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:41 am by Howard Knopf
 From Blacklock’s standpoint, the cost consequences of losing or even winning these cases could conceivably far exceed the upside of winning, given the way the Federal Courts costs rules can work with strategic and timely settlement offers where only modest amounts of money are recovered or recoverable. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by Tim Reed, FordHarrison
With respect to A-Train being high on Compound V, a June 2019 Washington Court of Appeals case might be instructive. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:16 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Beneficial National Bank v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ihnatowych, the Ontario Superior Court was faced with ambiguous language in the deceased’s will, specifically regarding the distribution of the estate’s residue. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:51 am
I was intrigued by the recent SC decision in Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya and Ors. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:43 am by Lorene Park
The employer argued that she had failed to identify a nonpregnant comparator who was treated differently, but the appellate court pointed out that the McDonnell Douglas framework was not the only way to use circumstantial evidence and her failure to produce a comparator was not dispositive. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Cineplex v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm by Sarah Tate Chambers
In 2014, the Supreme Court held in Riley v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]