Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2012, 1:04 pm
But don't worry; the governor has commissioned another study. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:57 am
I don't think so. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 3:30 am
Never mind that the plaintiffs didn't and couldn't prove that any of the outstanding problem was caused by any of the defendants. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:45 pm
And don't forget the court reporter: "Why don't you try me instead of her? [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:30 am
And Gorsuch is probably also correct that progressive defenders of the administrative state don't spend enough time grappling with those real harms. [read post]
Qualcomm's Mannheim Steamroller is stuttering: patents too young to defeat Apple in tech-savvy court
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
They don't take stays over validity concerns likely. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:08 am
Don't make threats against someone whose power far exceeds your own, and upon which you can't deliver.There has been a growing sense amongst law students, and even newer members of the bar, that we are all relative equals in the law. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 2:21 pm
We still don't know the answer to that question with anything like certainty. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am
I don't write this often, but in this case . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 1:49 pm
When then tied to hierarchies and notions of merit and authority, it can produce a toxic mixture in which everythin is personalized, and the personal is judged in relation to others. [read post]
22 May 2011, 8:28 am
May 17, 2011).Don’t bother looking for the holding in Leavitt: just wince your way through the first paragraph of C.J. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
 But while many of our graduates work in Big Law in Atlanta or Charlotte, most don't. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 6:20 am
Without this explanation, members of the public (like me) can't even meaningful argue for unsealing, since we don't know the basis for the sealing. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 3:51 pm
Knock wood that the Supreme Court lets this split percolate a bit – we don’t want to sweat the Fifth Vote on this Fourth issue. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
As Judge Posner noted in the Seventh Circuit's opinion: We don't understand why all three cases were not assigned to the same judge. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:40 pm
There are probably several other Pennsylvania cases for the same proposition in that search, which pulled up 25 cases, but we stopped with the first one since we don’t really care what the particular state statute is. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
I don't think so. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 3:23 am
"I don't want to see it end here," Baker said. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:48 pm
When we went to court, the judge was impressed. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
It came out the other end as if we had said, "this appears to be the first time a federal court has weighed in on the question of allowing former employees to offer regulatory interpretations" (again, emphasis ours).Don't make us look dumb, guys (we're perfectly capable of doing that ourselves).As lawyers, unlike reporters, we're supposed to know the difference between appellate cases and any old cases. … [read post]
