Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 2581 - 2600 of 29,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2015, 8:45 am by Ronald Mann
Knowing what they know today about the litigation costs associated with the rule of reason, the Justices well might think twice about directly importing that particular tool of antitrust doctrine into the patent domain. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
  See whether trial courts (and other panels in the Court of Appeal) agree with the most recent case -- Justice Premo's -- and agree that the prior case is old, bad law. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:11 am by Richard Frank
Later this month the justices will hear arguments in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:33 am by Adam Schlossman
  On the merits, it seemed that Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor were open to Richter’s ineffective assistance claim under Strickland v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 10:52 am by Stewart Caton
Well, apparently the Court of Appeals relied heavily on Wikipedia for the definition of “welfare queen. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm opinion, and even though the Supreme Court held the Apple v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:24 am by Stefanie Levine
First Concurrence Justice Breyer (joined by Justice Scalia and Justice Alito) gave a concurring opinion which began with the statement “I join the Court’s opinion in full. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
") Mr Justice Arnold's reasons for a referral are set out in paragraphs 93 pp:93 In the particular circumstances of this case, I concluded that the better course was to refer questions to the Court of Justice now, for the following reasons. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:21 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Seeing how the Supreme Court Justices, themselves members of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, deal with this issue will be very interesting indeed. [read post]