Search for: "v. AT&T Mobility" Results 2581 - 2600 of 5,405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 3:56 pm by Deepak Gupta
"  This morning, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
AT & T Mobility Services, LLC, 728 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2013) and asserted that the preponderance of the evidence standard applied, the plaintiff argued that the legal certainty standard set forth in Lowdermilk v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
In April 2011, several years after the Court of Appeals had ordered the trial court to reconsider its prior order granting defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility, LLC v Concepcion, which reiterated the rule that the principal purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) is to ensure that arbitration agreements are enforced according to their terms and held that “[r]equiring the… [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 2:34 pm by Brad Pauley
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, S204032, which includes the issue of whether AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 7:40 am by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
  We also still had a referral pending at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Nokia v Daimler. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:06 am by Florian Mueller
A recent Developer Economics report by VisionMobile says that "[t]he Mobile Developer Mindshare Q3 2013 shows Android leading at 71% of developers using the platform, followed by iOS at 56%", and the revenue gap is closing. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 am by Florian Mueller
By now, Deutsche Telekom (T-Mobile) is no longer selling OPPO and OnePlus phones, though one can still spot those products in some retail stores. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:39 am by Florian Mueller
As I announced last Saturday, I'm not going to comment publicly on App Store antitrust matters during the ongoing Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:46 pm by Marta Requejo
AnimalFeeds International Corp. and AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]