Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 2601 - 2620 of 14,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 2:27 pm by Jeremy
It is for the national courts in the Member States to determine, the AG continues, whether the parody either bears sufficient creativity as opposed to the parodied work, or should merely be regarded as a copy bearing insignificant alterations. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Griffin operates in approximately 20 states and has a plant in Dublin, Georgia. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Griffin operates in approximately 20 states and has a plant in Dublin, Georgia. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:52 pm
Moreover, the Court stated that the insurance companies should be held to bear the burden of their own misinterpretations of the statute, not the innocent and far less knowledgeable and legally sophisticated insured. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It was energizing to see that you saw the emergence of a children’s civil rights movement and you even championed Justice Douglas’s concurrence in Wisconsin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:17 pm by Giles Peaker
The excellent Liz Davies of Garden Court tackled the Court of Appeal decisions in MA & Ors and the benefit cap judgment in SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 156. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:17 pm by Giles Peaker
The excellent Liz Davies of Garden Court tackled the Court of Appeal decisions in MA & Ors and the benefit cap judgment in SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 156. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for a 6-3 Supreme Court majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]