Search for: "Berkeley v. Berkeley"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 2,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
Missouri has the power to withhold state assistance, “but the means it uses to achieve its ends must be [, as the Court observed in McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
B256605); The City of Beverly Hills v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Rob Merges, UC Berkeley Big changes over his career: the Supreme Court and you (audience). [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am
Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am
Ariel Katz has also written in a very scholarly way about problems with the way the Board deals with its mandate in a recent 2012 paper published in the Berkeley Technology Law Journal, available here. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm
The recently amended complaint against University of Mary Washington, filed with the federal Education Department, shows how Title IX has become a tool for people to try to suppress speech they disapprove of. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
I could not listen to the substance last night. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
The 18th Annual IP Scholars Conference is next week (Aug. 9-10) at Berkeley Law, and it includes over 140 academic talks given in six parallel tracks. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
Can make sense in individual cases even with good fair use defenses, but Rothman is concerned that courts incorporate these risk averse customs into their legal analysis—example from Ringgold v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm
Settlement of Viacom v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 2:05 am
Must you "friend" (v., transitive) someone you've only met once? [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:10 pm
” [Part I, here] [Part II, here] [Part III, here] [Part IV, here] [Part V, here] [And the piece in full, as a single document, from SSRN] The symposium is organized under the “2018 Symposium: Future of Legal Ed” tag. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
Berkeley : University of California Press, 1977 xxxv, 480 p. ; 19 cm. [read post]
